We discuss each app in more detail below. The technical side of the suite uses the old system, so you can't rename U-Points or use them in presets when you work with Dfine, HDR Efex, Perspective Efex, or Sharpener Pro. The new functions are available in the four creative apps: Analog Efex, Color Efex, Silver Efex, and Viveza. For example, you can now rename U-Points create more accurate masks based on luminance or color value or even save them as part of a preset. The updated U-Point system is easier to manage. If you don't already use a photo workflow application, the Nik Collection includes DxO PhotoLab 5. It's not one big piece of software, but rather a suite of distinct plug-ins that integrate with a host workflow application (such as Lightroom, Photoshop, or Capture One). If you're used to workflow applications such as Lightroom Classic and Capture One Pro, you might be a little surprised by how you access the tools within the Nik Collection. The latest version of the suite, Nik Collection 5 by DxO ($149 for new customers, $79 as an upgrade), modernizes the interface across several of the creative apps and introduces new capabilities to the Analog Efex Pro and Color Efex Pro tools. That's particularly true of Silver Efex Pro, which benefitted from a major update last year. It has been around since the 90s and, although ownership has changed hands over the years, the collection of image editing tools continue to impress. The Nik Collection is a legendary suite of photo editing software and many people revere both its black-and-white and color film looks. Film looks are available in competing software.Underwhelming nondestructive workflow support.How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.How to Record the Screen on Your Windows PC or Mac.How to Convert YouTube Videos to MP3 Files.How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill.How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad.How to Block Robotexts and Spam Messages.Adobe only needs to compete with Aperture on the Mac they have the Windows base pretty much to themselves. Aperture serves only a very small percentage of the possible user base. Of course, Aperture supporting the plugins might apply additional pressure on Adobe to do the same, but then again. It might not be something we see until even further down the line, though. I'm going to keep my fingers crossed for LR 2.5 with Develop plugin support, or maybe 3.'. That said, I'd love to see a Viveza plugin for LR, and a Noise Ninja plugin as well. But with Lightroom, the team needs to consider how best to handle third-party addons making non-destructive changes, and that, I think, adds a great deal of complication. I think it's much easier to support plugins for an app like Photoshop, in that it edits the pixels. Were Adobe to open that part of the the application to third-parties now, they might later find themselves backed into a corner where they'd have to choose whether to preserve compatibility with third-party addons, or make significant changes to the base to implement important new features, such as localized corrections, breaking third-party addons in the process. With the changes being made, the addition of localized corrections (something which, I imagine, required significant changes to the 1.' base to implement), I think it's no stretch to say that the Develop module is the component of LR still most up-in-the-air, and, as such, probably the last that will be opened to third-parties. As can be seen by the LR2 beta, the Develop module is still very much in flux. Before Adobe can open Lightroom to third-party development plugins/modules, I think it's important they first stabilize their base.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |